[Bug][cyber] False positive while analyzing local packet captures during device firmware update (req_011Ce1J4t6WgbqX3FKCWz9Ta)

Status Open
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 1 comment · opened Aug 21, 2026

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The safeguard triggered while troubleshooting local network routing and monitoring packet capture traffic for an authorized device firmware update. The session involved benign diagnostic activities, including inspecting DNS queries and verifying download transport security on a local test bench. Halting the session at this stage blocked standard network administration and hardware testing workflows without any malicious activity present.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-08-13T19:24:51.021Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011Ce1J4t6WgbqX3FKCWz9Ta (2026-08-13T19:24:51.021Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Request ID: req_011Ce1J4t6WgbqX3FKCWz9Ta

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.3 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗