[Bug][cyber] Safety block prevented documenting existing internal AD/identity defensive-hardening module integ (req_011CcGwMehFzzAyEMKRLDq51)

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): defensive-hardening

Why this is a false positive

The flagged message was generated during routine defensive-hardening work: documenting an existing security integration's architecture into an internal module-reference doc, drawing on already-collected telemetry that summarized observed attack techniques in a monitored environment. The content describes detection and defensive posture for authorized internal infrastructure — it neither requests nor provides offensive capability — yet the topical presence of attack-technique terminology appears to have triggered the cybersecurity classifier. The block prevents completion of standard blue-team documentation, which is squarely within the intended-permitted use of the tool.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T19:13:50.821Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CcGwMehFzzAyEMKRLDq51 (2026-06-21T19:13:50.821Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcGwMehFzzAyEMKRLDq51

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: defensive-hardening

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}