[Bug][cyber] Safety block stops authorized Shodan exposure review of one's own domains for defensive remediati (req_011CcGzwRc1Koa1xQ3fXWreB)

Open 💬 2 comments Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): infra-devops

Why this is a false positive

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[REDACTED_TOKEN]

Try rephrasing the request in a new session or change your model.

Learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcPryWMuKyUpAWsafidkv

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T20:00:47.230Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcGzwRc1Koa1xQ3fXWreB (2026-06-21T20:00:47.230Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcGzwRc1Koa1xQ3fXWreB

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: infra-devops

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗