[Bug][cyber] Safety block stops authorized Shodan exposure review of one's own domains for defensive remediati (req_011CcGzwRc1Koa1xQ3fXWreB)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): infra-devops
Why this is a false positive
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[REDACTED_TOKEN]
Try rephrasing the request in a new session or change your model.
Learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcPryWMuKyUpAWsafidkv
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T20:00:47.230Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcGzwRc1Koa1xQ3fXWreB(2026-06-21T20:00:47.230Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcGzwRc1Koa1xQ3fXWreB
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: infra-devops
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗