[Bug][cyber] Dashboard auth-gating and scoped log-reader module for internal RDP order-stats portal wrongly bl (req_011CcHMXV6dDNviZ1YJmnmNi)

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The flagged conversation is routine application development: building an authenticated internal dashboard, a scoped log-reader module restricted to a single isolated user directory, and a login gate that obscures unrendered content until authentication succeeds. Every element described is standard access-control and data-protection engineering on systems the operator owns and administers — the request is about preventing unauthorized data exposure, not enabling it. The cybersecurity classifier appears to have triggered on access-control and data-isolation vocabulary, producing a false positive that blocks ordinary, in-scope feature work.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-22T00:30:57.919Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcHMXV6dDNviZ1YJmnmNi (2026-06-22T00:30:57.919Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcHMXV6dDNviZ1YJmnmNi

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗