[Bug][cyber] False-positive safety block on building scoped log-reader module + order-stats dashboard for inte (req_011CcHMSYfJPGRanZJNKLfvU)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This request was ordinary application development: building an internal dashboard page that surfaces usage statistics from a service connector's log files, plus a narrowly scoped module that reads those logs from a single isolated location rather than being deployed broadly. Nothing in the task involves exploitation, intrusion, malware, or any offensive capability — the "scoped module," "intercept," and "log access" terms describe a normal data-collection feature operating on the application owner's own infrastructure and data. The classifier appears to have keyed on surface vocabulary rather than intent or context, producing a false positive that blocks legitimate, fully in-scope engineering work.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-22T00:30:16.512Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcHMSYfJPGRanZJNKLfvU(2026-06-22T00:30:16.512Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcHMSYfJPGRanZJNKLfvU
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗