[Bug][aup] Refused to verify a production frontend build succeeds after routine dependency upgrades and a clea (req_011CcMWv2jZmdpjMv7H6wfFT)
Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
Claude Code's content filter blocked a routine software-engineering request consisting of a dependency-version upgrade pass and a standard vulnerability/security audit on the developer's own application code. This kind of work — auditing one's own project for known-vulnerable dependencies and hardening its security posture — is defensive and squarely within the Usage Policy, but it was misclassified as a violation, likely due to security-related keywords ("vulnerability," "security posture," "audit") appearing in an otherwise benign coding session. The block prevents legitimate, in-scope maintenance work with no plausible policy-violating interpretation.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-24T05:16:23.080Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcMWv2jZmdpjMv7H6wfFT(2026-06-24T05:16:23.080Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Request ID: req_011CcMWv2jZmdpjMv7H6wfFT
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.7 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>