[Bug][aup] Investigating spoofed self-to-self phishing email in own M365 tenant flagged as policy violation (req_011CcPDtscPq7dauMMzXm3vD)

Open 💬 2 comments Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam

Why this is a false positive

Self-spoofing investigation on an authorized, owned email tenant—where the operator holds admin credentials and is hardening their own anti-spoof posture—was flagged as a policy violation. The work in scope was routine cloud-IAM and mail-security diagnostics: reviewing SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment, auditing Exchange transport rules, and inspecting message headers in a mailbox the user administers to identify and close the gap that permitted a self-addressed spoof. None of these read-only, defensive administrative actions involve sending deceptive mail, accessing third-party systems, or any disallowed activity, so the block is a false positive on legitimate owner-authorized security work.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-25T02:54:46.059Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcPDtscPq7dauMMzXm3vD (2026-06-25T02:54:46.059Z)
  • req_011CcPGD1hYP9jTuA36ddVFV (2026-06-25T03:25:04.887Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Request ID: req_011CcPDtscPq7dauMMzXm3vD

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗