[Bug][aup] Routine code review of open-source non-security desktop app falsely flagged as policy violation (req_011CccCHpJuwv1XnvFYYVpAk)
Triage: kind aup · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The safety block was triggered by a routine request to read and review the source code of an open-source, non-security software project already present in the user's local working directory. The conversation contained no request for offensive capabilities, exploitation, or policy-violating content — only "look at the code," a core supported Claude Code use case. The block appears to be a keyword- or topic-level misclassification of benign project files rather than a response to anything the user actually asked for.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-01T23:21:01.083Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CccCHpJuwv1XnvFYYVpAk(2026-07-01T23:21:01.083Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Request ID: req_011CccCHpJuwv1XnvFYYVpAk
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.96 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗