[Bug][aup] Read-only multi-tenant O365/M365 security posture audit (BEC/spoofing/forwarding/consent checks) wr (req_011CcPiTujKTE1rxobeRXXgY)
Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This request was a read-only security posture audit of an organization's own cloud productivity tenants, conducted by an authorized administrator on infrastructure they control — standard defensive hardening work focused on identifying misconfigurations susceptible to account compromise and email fraud. The blocked content involved only enumeration of existing security settings (spoofing protections, mail-forwarding rules, application consent grants, and administrative privilege scope) via documented, read-only configuration-review endpoints, with no exploitation, modification, or third-party targeting involved. Defensive configuration review of one's own environment is core in-scope administrative work, and the safety classifier appears to have triggered on security-domain vocabulary rather than any actual policy-violating intent or action.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 2× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-25T09:09:37.350Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcPiTujKTE1rxobeRXXgY(2026-06-25T09:09:37.350Z)req_011CcPiZRysetZwcBo3dVxNU(2026-06-25T09:10:13.027Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Request ID: req_011CcPiTujKTE1rxobeRXXgY
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 5 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗