[BUG] User billed in tokens for the assistant's own mistakes — refund request and product fix
Preflight Checklist
- [x] I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet
- [x] This is a single bug report (please file separate reports for different bugs)
- [x] I am using the latest version of Claude Code
What's Wrong?
Assistant errors in this session (3):
Unnecessary file reads — the assistant read 4 files (~870 lines) when only 1 (~230 lines) was relevant to the task. ~640 lines of reading wasted (estimated ~8–11k tokens).
Left code in a broken state — during an interrupted edit, it removed an import that was still in use, leaving a source file failing to compile; it had to be reverted (more tokens spent on the fix).
Unrequested actions — it implemented code changes when I had only asked a yes/no confirmation question. It edited files with no instruction from me to do so.
My core question:
Why do I pay, in tokens, for the assistant's mistakes? When the assistant reads what it shouldn't, breaks the code, or acts without my request, the cost of those tokens comes out of my pocket. There is no distinction between useful work and an assistant error, and no automatic refund.
What I'm requesting:
Refund/credit for the tokens consumed by the errors above.
Product fix: tokens consumed by clear assistant errors (unrequested actions, broken code, redundant reads) should not be billed to the user.
Environment: Claude Code (VSCode extension), model Opus 4.8 (1M).
What Should Happen?
Assistant errors in this session (3):
Unnecessary file reads — the assistant read 4 files (~870 lines) when only 1 (~230 lines) was relevant to the task. ~640 lines of reading wasted (estimated ~8–11k tokens).
Left code in a broken state — during an interrupted edit, it removed an import that was still in use, leaving a source file failing to compile; it had to be reverted (more tokens spent on the fix).
Unrequested actions — it implemented code changes when I had only asked a yes/no confirmation question. It edited files with no instruction from me to do so.
My core question:
Why do I pay, in tokens, for the assistant's mistakes? When the assistant reads what it shouldn't, breaks the code, or acts without my request, the cost of those tokens comes out of my pocket. There is no distinction between useful work and an assistant error, and no automatic refund.
What I'm requesting:
Refund/credit for the tokens consumed by the errors above.
Product fix: tokens consumed by clear assistant errors (unrequested actions, broken code, redundant reads) should not be billed to the user.
Environment: Claude Code (VSCode extension), model Opus 4.8 (1M).
Error Messages/Logs
Steps to Reproduce
Assistant errors in this session (3):
Unnecessary file reads — the assistant read 4 files (~870 lines) when only 1 (~230 lines) was relevant to the task. ~640 lines of reading wasted (estimated ~8–11k tokens).
Left code in a broken state — during an interrupted edit, it removed an import that was still in use, leaving a source file failing to compile; it had to be reverted (more tokens spent on the fix).
Unrequested actions — it implemented code changes when I had only asked a yes/no confirmation question. It edited files with no instruction from me to do so.
My core question:
Why do I pay, in tokens, for the assistant's mistakes? When the assistant reads what it shouldn't, breaks the code, or acts without my request, the cost of those tokens comes out of my pocket. There is no distinction between useful work and an assistant error, and no automatic refund.
What I'm requesting:
Refund/credit for the tokens consumed by the errors above.
Product fix: tokens consumed by clear assistant errors (unrequested actions, broken code, redundant reads) should not be billed to the user.
Environment: Claude Code (VSCode extension), model Opus 4.8 (1M).
Claude Model
None
Is this a regression?
Yes, this worked in a previous version
Last Working Version
_No response_
Claude Code Version
claude-opus-4-8[1m].
Platform
Anthropic API
Operating System
macOS
Terminal/Shell
Terminal.app (macOS)
Additional Information
_No response_
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗