[BUG] Wasted /ultrareview because of interruption

Resolved 💬 3 comments Opened Apr 30, 2026 by MarcoZabunje Closed May 4, 2026

Preflight Checklist

  • [x] I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet
  • [x] This is a single bug report (please file separate reports for different bugs)
  • [x] I am using the latest version of Claude Code

What's Wrong?

I ran /ultrareview on my branch and it kicked off fine and then it got interrupted by "Remote review completed
 API Error: Server is temporarily limiting requests (not your usage limit) · Rate
limited"

And upon trying to ultrareview again I saw that I now about to use my second token for ultrareview, meaning the first one was essentially wasted because you rate limited in the middle of it, and I didn't get a review but am missing a token.

The problem: I started this session with 3 free ultrareviews. After all of the above
one run that returned nothing useful, one that got rate-limited.

What I'd expect:

  • A run that returns empty findings on a 240k-line diff probably shouldn't count (or

should at least be flagged so the user knows to rescope).

  • A run that's cancelled should definitely not count.
  • A rate-limit error from your end shouldn't burn a credit either.

Session info:

  • First run session: session_013GpWRdmK429im6xxKp1cn8
  • Branch: feature/engine-foundation → main
  • Diff size: 896 files, 243,134 insertions
  • Date: 2026-04-30

What Should Happen?

Could you take a look and refund the credits if this matches what your logs show?
Happy to provide more detail if useful.

Error Messages/Logs

"Remote review completed
   API Error: Server is temporarily limiting requests (not your usage limit) · Rate
     limited"

Steps to Reproduce

I'm not sure

Claude Model

Opus

Is this a regression?

Yes, this worked in a previous version

Last Working Version

_No response_

Claude Code Version

2.1.123

Platform

Anthropic API

Operating System

Other Linux

Terminal/Shell

Other

Additional Information

My Claude account is associated with the email nedeljkovic.maki@gmail.com

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 3 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗