[FEATURE] Compensation policy when Claude's cost estimates cause unexpected billing

Preflight Checklist

• [x] I have searched existing requests and this feature hasn't been requested yet
• [x] This is a single feature request (not multiple features)

Problem Statement

Claude Code estimated that a Google Places API import script would cost $0 (within the free tier), but the actual bill
was ¥70,540 (~$470 USD). Claude proposed the plan, wrote the script, provided the "$0" cost estimate, and I approved
based on that estimate. The root cause was Claude failing to account for Nearby Search pagination (nextPageToken)
multiplying request counts from ~11,000 to 36,883. When an AI's cost estimate directly causes significant unexpected
charges, there is currently no compensation or recourse from Anthropic.

Proposed Solution

Introduce a goodwill credit policy (e.g., Claude Pro/Max subscription credits) for cases where Claude's incorrect
guidance directly leads to significant unexpected financial costs. AI-generated cost estimates carry implicit
authority, and users reasonably rely on them to make decisions.

Alternative Solutions

1. Claude should refuse to provide specific cost estimates for usage-based APIs, and instead recommend users verify

costs themselves before execution.

1. Claude should automatically suggest setting up budget alerts and API quota limits before executing any billable API

scripts.

1. A dedicated support channel for reporting AI-caused financial incidents, separate from general feature requests.

Priority

High - Significant impact on productivity

Feature Category

Other

Use Case Example

_No response_

Additional Context

_No response_