[FEATURE] Independent Context Windows for Sub-Agents

Resolved 💬 3 comments Opened Oct 23, 2025 by ravikalla Closed Oct 27, 2025

Preflight Checklist

  • [x] I have searched existing requests and this feature hasn't been requested yet
  • [x] This is a single feature request (not multiple features)

Problem Statement

When orchestrating multiple sub-agents for complex analysis tasks (e.g., analyzing 8 feature tracks in a large codebase), all sub-agents share the parent session's 200K token budget and hit the 8192 output token limit.

Real Example:
While building an operational dashboard, I needed 5 sub-agents to analyze database schema, testing patterns, API design, etc. in parallel.

What Happened:

  • 3 out of 5 sub-agents exceeded the 8192 token output limit
  • Each failure consumed 10-15K tokens from the shared budget before truncation
  • Error: "API Error: Claude's response exceeded the 8192 output token maximum"
  • Forced to use workaround: sub-agents write to files, return only 500-word summaries

Impact on Workflow:

  • Cannot get comprehensive analysis back from sub-agents (truncated)
  • Parent token budget exhausted after 3-4 sub-agent failures
  • Must run sub-agents sequentially instead of in parallel (5-10x slower)
  • Manual file management adds complexity

Current Workaround:
Instruct sub-agents: "Write full analysis to docs/file.md, return only summary" - but this prevents interactive follow-up and adds overhead.

Proposed Solution

Ideal Experience:

When I launch a sub-agent that will generate large output, Claude Code automatically runs it in a separate terminal with its own 200K token budget, then returns the full result to me.

How I'd Interact:

  1. Launch sub-agent normally - no change to current workflow:

"Launch a sub-agent to analyze Track 1.0 implementation patterns across 50+ files"

  1. Automatic routing - Claude Code detects this will generate 20K+ tokens and says:

"This analysis will generate ~60KB output. I'm running this sub-agent in a separate terminal to preserve our token budget here. Status: [Sub-agent analyzing... 45% complete]"

  1. Get full results - Sub-agent completes and I receive:
  • Executive summary in current chat (500 words)
  • Option to see full output: "Show full analysis" → displays all 60KB
  • Results auto-saved to workspace for reference

What I expect:

  • Small tasks (<5K tokens) still run instantly in current terminal (no overhead)
  • Large tasks automatically get independent context (no manual setup)
  • Can launch 5-10 sub-agents in parallel without token exhaustion
  • Zero "output exceeded token limit" errors
  • Full analysis returned, not truncated

Current workaround that validates this:
I manually instruct sub-agents to write to files - this proves independent execution works, just needs automation.

Alternative Solutions

Alternatives Tried:

  1. File-based workaround (CURRENT):
  • Sub-agents write full analysis to docs/analysis.md
  • Return only 500-word summary to parent
  • Downside: No interactive follow-up, manual file management, breaks conversational flow
  1. Sequential sub-agents instead of parallel:
  • Run one sub-agent at a time to avoid token budget exhaustion
  • Downside: 5-10x slower (hours instead of minutes), defeats purpose of parallelism
  1. Split large tasks into smaller chunks:
  • Break 60KB analysis into 6 smaller 10KB tasks
  • Downside: Loses coherence, overhead of coordination, still hits limits eventually
  1. Manual separate terminals (WORKS but tedious):
  • Manually open new Claude Code terminal for large tasks
  • Copy/paste context and instructions
  • Downside: Manual overhead, context loss, not scalable for 5+ sub-agents

Why these aren't sufficient:

The file-based workaround proves the concept works (independent execution), but requires too much manual orchestration. What's needed is automation of what I'm already doing manually - intelligent routing of large tasks to independent contexts.

Ideal solution validates against real usage:
I've successfully used manual separate terminals for deep analysis - confirming this approach works. Just needs to be automated by Claude Code.

Priority

High - Significant impact on productivity

Feature Category

API and model interactions

Use Case Example

Scenario: Building an operational dashboard for an enterprise application with 8 feature tracks (Sensitive Types CRUD, Regex Patterns, Provider Config, Flow Config, User/RBAC, System Settings, Alerts, Compliance).

Step-by-step with current limitations:

  1. I start planning: "Analyze the existing codebase to plan Track 1.1 (Regex Pattern Management)"
  1. Launch analysis sub-agents:
  • Sub-agent 1: "Analyze Track 1.0 implementation patterns (database schema, service layer, controllers)"
  • Sub-agent 2: "Analyze existing test patterns and coverage strategy"
  • Sub-agent 3: "Review REST API design patterns from similar CRUD features"
  • Sub-agent 4: "Examine MapStruct usage for DTO transformations"
  • Sub-agent 5: "Identify reusable components and utilities"
  1. What happens NOW:
  • Sub-agent 1 returns 8,000 tokens → ❌ Error: "Output exceeded 8192 token limit"
  • Consumed 12K tokens from my 200K budget before truncation
  • Sub-agent 2 returns 6,500 tokens → ✅ Success (but close to limit)
  • Sub-agent 3 hits limit → ❌ Another failure, another 10K tokens wasted
  • Token budget now at 166K (consumed 34K, got 50% useful output)
  • Must run remaining sub-agents sequentially to avoid exhaustion
  1. Current workaround:
  • Restart: "Write analysis to docs/track-10-analysis.md, return 500-word summary"
  • Works, but I can't ask follow-up questions without reading the file manually
  • Takes 2-3 hours instead of 30 minutes

How it would work WITH this feature:

  1. Same start: "Analyze existing codebase to plan Track 1.1"
  1. Launch all 5 sub-agents in parallel (same as before)
  1. Claude Code intelligently routes:
  • Sub-agent 1 (60KB output expected) → Separate terminal, independent 200K budget
  • Sub-agent 2 (40KB output) → Separate terminal
  • Sub-agent 3 (45KB output) → Separate terminal
  • Sub-agent 4 (30KB output) → Separate terminal
  • Sub-agent 5 (15KB output) → Current terminal (small enough)
  1. I see progress: "Running 4 sub-agents in parallel terminals... [75% complete]"
  1. All return full results:
  • Executive summaries in chat (2K tokens total)
  • Full analyses available: "Show Track 1.0 analysis" → displays all 60KB
  • Zero truncation errors
  • My token budget: 198K remaining (only 2K used for summaries)
  1. Time saved: 30 minutes vs 2-3 hours (80% reduction)

This is my actual workflow - I do this 2-3 times per week when planning new features.

Additional Context

Related GitHub Issues:
This builds on existing requests but addresses a specific gap:

  • #3013 - Parallel Agent Execution (focuses on 100s of agents, this is for 5-10)
  • #6854 - Non-blocking tasks (notification-based, this is about independent contexts)
  • #5812 - Hooks for context bridging (inter-agent communication, complementary)
  • #4908 - Scoped Context Passing (partial solution, this proposes full isolation)

Technical Considerations:

Context Transfer Strategy:

  • Parent → Sub-agent: Task description, relevant file paths, environment variables
  • Sub-agent → Parent: Default 500-word summary, full output on demand
  • Configurable modes: full, partial, minimal context copying

Token Budget Allocation:

  • Each independent sub-agent: 200K token budget (same as parent)
  • Optional: Custom budgets (50K-500K) based on task complexity
  • Advanced: Token pooling (5 sub-agents share 1M tokens)

Proof of Concept:
The manual workaround (opening separate terminals) already validates this approach works. Key observations:

  • Separate terminals DO provide independent 200K budgets ✅
  • Full analysis completes without truncation ✅
  • No parent token budget impact ✅
  • Only missing: Automation and orchestration intelligence

Implementation Hint:
Could be phased approach:

  1. Phase 1: Document manual hybrid pattern (works TODAY, zero dev needed)
  2. Phase 2: Add execution_mode parameter to Task tool
  3. Phase 3: Automatic routing based on estimated output size

Similar Features in Other Tools:

  • VS Code: Multiple terminal instances with independent contexts
  • tmux/screen: Session isolation
  • Kubernetes: Pod-level resource limits

ANTHROPIC_FEATURE_REQUEST.md

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 3 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗