**Bug Description** Hello there. I have two great ideas: - First: a "thumbs up" for any line on the CLI. Double click or a way to select the line. And you can let know, brifly, the next conversation threads know that user liked or READ that ;) the feedback to the system will help the IA to undestand that something was seen, and user is aware, and also, that feedback is nice. We can even extend feedback per line? Think about this please - IF we split the "non technical" answers of the IA from the

[Feature Request] Add per-line feedback mechanism and separate technical/conversational output streams

Status Open

Reported on v2.1.286

Maintainer reply None cached

Activity 0 comments · opened Oct 1, 2026

Bug Description
Hello there. I have two great ideas:

First: a "thumbs up" for any line on the CLI. Double click or a way to select the line. And you can let know, brifly, the next conversation threads know that user liked or READ that ;) the feedback to the system will help the IA to undestand that something was seen, and user is aware, and also, that feedback is nice. We can even extend feedback per line? Think about this please
IF we split the "non technical" answers of the IA from the technical read of files? I want to have both, to understand what the system is reading AND not lose the messages that IA is providing! So much parallel work, makes the main thread noisy. There's a solution that I'm missing?

Thank you!

Environment Info

Errors

[]