[Bug] Overly broad safeguard false positive on legitimate IoT device API integration

Bug Description
I believe Claude's cyber safeguards may have incorrectly flagged a legitimate development request. I am developing an ESP32-based device that connects to a service where GPS coordinates from my own devices are uploaded. The GPS devices are owned by me, and I access the service through a valid account that I purchased and control. My request was to help create software/API integration so that my ESP32 device could retrieve or interact with data associated with my own devices and account. The request did not involve unauthorized access, bypassing security controls, reverse engineering protected systems, or accessing data belonging to others. However, the conversation was blocked with the following message: "API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work." From my perspective, this appears to be a false positive. The task was a legitimate IoT/software integration project involving hardware and accounts that I own. It would be helpful to understand: Which part of the request triggered the cyber safeguard. Whether requests involving integration with user-owned devices and accounts are being classified too broadly. * How developers can describe legitimate API and device-integration work without triggering these safeguards. Request ID: req_011CfBShwD1fFrnMp1YpXquJ Thank you for reviewing this case.

Environment Info

• Platform: win32
• Terminal: windows-terminal
• Version: 2.1.270
• Feedback ID: 899cba5a-d127-4939-8a06-02485e01fc1d

Errors

[]