[Bug][cyber] Safeguards block source code recovery from binary DWARF debug symbols (req_011Ceeeh47z6hwXb6mH8erJX)
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The session involved reconstructing missing source files, test fixtures, and function stubs using DWARF debugging symbols from a compiled binary. The cyber safeguard triggered on automated symbol extraction and code generation tasks during routine module reconstruction. This false positive interrupted legitimate software development work after the target module compiled cleanly.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-09-02T12:57:15.291Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011Ceeeh47z6hwXb6mH8erJX(2026-09-02T12:57:15.291Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude
Details: [cyber]
Request ID: req_011Ceeeh47z6hwXb6mH8erJX
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#94107, #94108, #94109, #94110, #94111, #94112, #94113, #94114, #94115
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗