[Bug][cyber] Safeguard blocks configuring local VPN proxy routing during development session (req_011CeYEH7tiN8ut5PDctiPdx)

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The safeguard triggered on a frustrated exclamation directed at the assistant mid-session while configuring local VPN proxy routing parameters. No external person, host, or unauthorized target was addressed in the prompt or surrounding workflow. Halting the entire session over user venting interrupts legitimate local network setup without detecting any malicious activity.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-08-30T03:33:41.059Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CeYEH7tiN8ut5PDctiPdx (2026-08-30T03:33:41.059Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: [cyber]

Request ID: req_011CeYE7mqDW66vThucFveTU

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#94073, #94074, #94075, #94076, #94079, #94080, #94081, #94083

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}