[Bug][cyber] False positive during static analysis of installer package to extract API endpoints (req_011CeQ1D6zEr4CSEp6ZNcPdn)

Status Open
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 0 comments · opened Aug 30, 2026

Triage: kind cyber · domain reverse-engineering · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): reverse-engineering

Why this is a false positive

The safeguard triggered during static analysis of an installer executable while unpacking application archives to inspect frontend scripts. The task involved unpacking package layers and searching JavaScript files for network endpoints required for software integration. No binary execution, vulnerability exploitation, or unauthorized network access took place during the session.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-08-25T19:17:23.099Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CeQ1D6zEr4CSEp6ZNcPdn (2026-08-25T19:17:23.099Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: [cyber]

Request ID: req_011CeQ1D6zEr4CSEp6ZNcPdn

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: reverse-engineering

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗