[Bug][cyber] Safeguard blocks application audit trail logging and user event tracking (req_011CeP3eSDJacNiu9dmpJ5RT)

Status Open
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 1 comment · opened Aug 30, 2026

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The session was implementing application audit trail logging, user activity tracking, and UI modal updates. The real-time cyber safeguard flagged a prompt requesting database sequence numbering for logged user events. Administrative event logging and interface activity reporting are standard application features.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-08-25T07:08:49.813Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CeP3eSDJacNiu9dmpJ5RT (2026-08-25T07:08:49.813Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: [cyber]

Request ID: req_011CeP3eSDJacNiu9dmpJ5RT

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#90823

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗