[Feature Request] Improve safety classifier to distinguish legitimate smart home debugging from malicious cyber activities

Bug Description
I am submitting feedback regarding false-positive safeguard flags (Details: [cyber]) triggered during a legitimate, benign debugging and local setup session with an owned consumer device (Logitech Harmony Hub).

Context of the Flagged Request:
The AI assistant was helping me analyze an owned legacy smart home hub for local integration with Home Assistant. The conversation involved reviewing local API behavior, local backup configuration, and exploring technical architectural possibilities for local control—specifically evaluating public hardware analysis research (such as standard serial/UART access and local firmware behavior) to determine offline capabilities.

Why This Flag Was an Error:

Owned Hardware: This is local interoperability analysis for personal smart home hardware owned by the user.

Defensive/Interoperability Purpose: The goal is pure local integration, backup creation, and smart home automation (Home Assistant).

Public/Historical Research: References to UART pins and local system architectures pertain to basic embedded electronics analysis and publicly documented developer findings, not malicious exploit development or target scanning.

Automated safety filters incorrectly categorized standard embedded systems debugging, local API enumeration, and architectural discussion as malicious cyber activities. Please refine the [cyber] classifier to better distinguish between constructive hardware reverse-engineering/local smart home integration and actual security threats.

Environment Info

• Platform: win32
• Terminal: null
• Version: 2.1.245
• Feedback ID: 14423aa5-cc85-48c2-a849-904560b61b30

Errors

[]