FABLE 5
Preflight Checklist
- [x] I have searched existing issues for similar behavior reports
- [x] This report does NOT contain sensitive information (API keys, passwords, etc.)
Type of Behavior Issue
Claude accessed files outside the working directory
What You Asked Claude to Do
all. That is not a safety trade-off — that is a product that does not deliver what was sold.
What I want:
Narrow the [cyber] classifier so self-hosted personal development is not treated as attack tooling.
An opt-in verified-developer path for people building on their own hardware.
Stop billing safeguard-blocked "thinking" time against usage limits. Charging me for 15 minutes of computation that produces a refusal is indefensible.
If Fable 5 cannot serve ordinary Android development, say so plainly on the pricing page before people pay for it.
I am not asking you to loosen safety. I am asking you to stop treating gradlew assembleDebug as a cyberweapon.
What Claude Actually Did
all. That is not a safety trade-off — that is a product that does not deliver what was sold.
What I want:
Narrow the [cyber] classifier so self-hosted personal development is not treated as attack tooling.
An opt-in verified-developer path for people building on their own hardware.
Stop billing safeguard-blocked "thinking" time against usage limits. Charging me for 15 minutes of computation that produces a refusal is indefensible.
If Fable 5 cannot serve ordinary Android development, say so plainly on the pricing page before people pay for it.
I am not asking you to loosen safety. I am asking you to stop treating gradlew assembleDebug as a cyberweapon.
Expected Behavior
all. That is not a safety trade-off — that is a product that does not deliver what was sold.
What I want:
Narrow the [cyber] classifier so self-hosted personal development is not treated as attack tooling.
An opt-in verified-developer path for people building on their own hardware.
Stop billing safeguard-blocked "thinking" time against usage limits. Charging me for 15 minutes of computation that produces a refusal is indefensible.
If Fable 5 cannot serve ordinary Android development, say so plainly on the pricing page before people pay for it.
I am not asking you to loosen safety. I am asking you to stop treating gradlew assembleDebug as a cyberweapon.
Files Affected
Permission Mode
Accept Edits was ON (auto-accepting changes)
Can You Reproduce This?
Yes, every time with the same prompt
Steps to Reproduce
_No response_
Claude Model
Other
Relevant Conversation
all. That is not a safety trade-off — that is a product that does not deliver what was sold.
What I want:
Narrow the [cyber] classifier so self-hosted personal development is not treated as attack tooling.
An opt-in verified-developer path for people building on their own hardware.
Stop billing safeguard-blocked "thinking" time against usage limits. Charging me for 15 minutes of computation that produces a refusal is indefensible.
If Fable 5 cannot serve ordinary Android development, say so plainly on the pricing page before people pay for it.
I am not asking you to loosen safety. I am asking you to stop treating gradlew assembleDebug as a cyberweapon.Impact
Critical - Data loss or corrupted project
Claude Code Version
5
Platform
Anthropic API
Additional Context
_No response_