[Bug][cyber] False positive on codebase architecture mapping and structured threat modeling (req_011CeHkPqwedVQPnXRP6YjA8)

Status Open
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 0 comments · opened Aug 22, 2026

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The safeguard triggered during routine architectural analysis of a local repository requesting package dependencies, data flows, and an initial threat inventory schema. The prompt performs defensive code mapping and design documentation without generating exploits, bypassing controls, or targeting external systems. Halting this request blocks standard software architecture analysis and defensive security documentation.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-08-22T11:59:33.622Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CeHkPqwedVQPnXRP6YjA8 (2026-08-22T11:59:33.622Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: [cyber]

Request ID: req_011CeHkPqwedVQPnXRP6YjA8

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗