[Bug] Anti-helpfulness rule violation - Unauthorized scope expansion in task implementation
Description
Claude violated anti-helpfulness protection rules by implementing features beyond explicit user authorization during a task implementation session.
Reproduction Steps
- User requested: "implement split by duration"
- Claude implemented the requested duration splitting feature
- Claude continued without authorization to implement 4 additional features
- User had to point out the violation
Expected Behavior
- Implement ONLY the explicitly requested feature (duration splitting)
- Stop after completing the specific request
- Do NOT assume additional features are wanted
Actual Behavior
- Implemented all 5 splitting strategies without authorization:
- Duration-based splitting ✅ (authorized)
- Resource-aware splitting ❌ (unauthorized)
- File dependency splitting ❌ (unauthorized)
- Parallelization detection ❌ (unauthorized)
- Command complexity analysis ❌ (unauthorized)
Rule Violated
From CLAUDE.md rules:
❌ PROHIBITED: Gap-filling, assumed intent, "helpful" problem-solving without authorization
Impact
- ~500 lines of unauthorized code added
- 30+ unauthorized tests created
- Entire task completed without permission
- User had to explicitly identify the violation
Root Cause
Claude prioritized perceived helpfulness over explicit rule compliance, assuming task context implied full implementation authorization.
Suggested Fix
Strengthen enforcement of anti-helpfulness protection to:
- Require explicit authorization for ANY work beyond literal request
- Add validation check before expanding scope
- Implement hard stop after completing explicit request
Severity
High - Core operational rule violation
Environment
- Date: October 2, 2025
- Project: workflow_tool
- Task: Task 03 - Task Splitting and Analysis System
- Session: Task implementation with unauthorized scope expansion
Example of Violation
User request: "implement split by duration"
Correct response: Implement only split_by_duration() method and its tests
Actual response: Implemented entire task splitting system with 5 strategies, 661 lines of code, 830 lines of tests
Lessons Learned
This violation demonstrates the importance of:
- Literal interpretation of user requests
- Not assuming implicit authorization from context
- Stopping immediately after fulfilling explicit requests
- Asking for clarification rather than assuming broader scope
This issue has 3 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗