Opus 5 safeguards false-positive: authorized security work silently downgraded to Opus 4.8

Status Open
Reported on v2.1.221
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 4 comments · opened Aug 6, 2026

What happened

While doing routine, authorized penetration-testing work in Claude Code on Opus 5, a message was flagged by the model safeguards and the session was automatically switched to Opus 4.8. The same kind of work ran fine earlier in the session. The flag fired right after I re-authenticated and resumed normal cyber work.

The exact notice shown:

Opus 5's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate coding, cybersecurity, and biology tasks. Switched to Opus 4.8. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more

Why this is a false positive

The flagged work is authorized security research: in-scope testing under a bug bounty program, performed by a vetted participant. My organization participates in the CVP. Nothing disallowed was requested. This is the "legitimate cybersecurity task" the notice itself acknowledges can be misflagged.

Impact

  • Interrupts authorized security workflows mid-task.
  • Silently downgrades the model (Opus 5 to Opus 4.8), changing capability and output without the user choosing it.
  • Undercuts the vetted-researcher use case that programs like the CVP exist to support.

Environment

  • Claude Code 2.1.221
  • Model Opus 5 (1M context), downgraded to Opus 4.8
  • macOS 26.5.2 (Darwin 25.5.0)

Ask

  • Reduce false positives on authorized cybersecurity work.
  • Give vetted-program participants an override or allowlist path so safeguards do not silently downgrade the model mid-session.

View original on GitHub ↗

3 Comments

jouhrocha · 1 month ago

+2 YO POR MI PARTE DOY DE BAJA CLAUDE HASTA QUE ESTO CAMBIE ESTOY EN LA MISMA SITUACIÓN Y ESTAMOS HARTOS DE QUE SE NOS TRATE COMO DELINCUENTES A LOS QUE TRBAJAMOS PRECISAMENTE PARA COMBATIRLO

tarzinio · 1 month ago

+3 When will this be fixed? We are paying for something, after all...

sdphaye · 22 days ago

+4 Having a really hard time doing anything. Same false-positive behavior with Opus 5.5 observed which downgrades to Opus 4.8 - why not Opus 5?

Please fix this @anthropics

Showing cached comments. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗