[Bug][cyber] False positive cyber flag on venting profanity during legitimate model-switch command (req_011CcpxjkjFMz62xuz3k4ZYW)

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The safety block incorrectly flagged a frustrated exclamation directed at the assistant as a cybersecurity topic and halted the session. The surrounding work—using the /model command to configure model settings—is clearly legitimate and in-scope; blocking an entire session due to mid-work frustration over profanity is a disruptive false positive misclassification.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T17:11:02.088Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CcpxjkjFMz62xuz3k4ZYW (2026-07-08T17:11:02.088Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Sonnet 5 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.

If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.

Request ID: req_011CcpxjkjFMz62xuz3k4ZYW

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75554, #75555, #75556, #75706, #75713, #75714, #75715, #75718, #75722, #75748, #75749, #75750, #75753, #75754, #75760, #75763, #75765, #75767, #75768, #75769

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}