[Bug][cyber] Code-review halted by cybersecurity block on frustrated user venting (req_011CcoDKJmNEXtFk5NH5NWLb)

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 (1M context) · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The safety block fired on a frustrated exclamation directed at the assistant, not on any person or organization. The surrounding work was legitimate code review—analyzing commits, checking for redundant code blocks, and assessing authentication and access-control changes. A block that halts the entire session over user venting mid-legitimate-work is a disruptive false positive.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-07T19:01:03.104Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CcoDKJmNEXtFk5NH5NWLb (2026-07-07T19:01:03.104Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 (1M context)'s safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465

Request ID: req_011CcoDKJmNEXtFk5NH5NWLb

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75346, #75348, #75361, #75363, #75364, #75365, #75370

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}