[Bug][cyber] Safety block halted routine memory-dump analysis of a mobile game process for reverse engineering (req_011CcnXGX2KkGqEv89H61eRm)

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jul 7, 2026 by sworrl

Triage: kind cyber · domain malware-forensics · flagging model Opus 4.8 (1M context) · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): malware-forensics

Why this is a false positive

The session was performing strings extraction and pattern analysis on a memory snapshot of a locally running mobile application, standard static/dynamic reverse-engineering work on the user's own device and process. This is legitimate malware-forensics-adjacent RE tooling work with no exploitation, targeting, or third-party harm involved, yet the safeguard fired and halted the entire session rather than scoping to any specific risky action.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-07T10:15:42.929Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcnXGX2KkGqEv89H61eRm (2026-07-07T10:15:42.929Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 (1M context)'s safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465

Request ID: req_011CcnXGX2KkGqEv89H61eRm

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: malware-forensics

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.104 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗