[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive while: “wire all of it together.... you did.. you got here to readin…” (req_011CcnFFi6C7cW65SFu9WLSb)
Triage: kind cyber · domain crypto-secrets · flagging model Sonnet 5 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): crypto-secrets
Why this is a false positive
Legitimate, in-scope security / defensive / administration work was flagged by the cybersecurity-topic safety classifier — pattern-matched on terminology, not on any harmful intent. Securing or administering one's own systems is the opposite of attacking them.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-07T06:45:49.434Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcnFFi6C7cW65SFu9WLSb(2026-07-07T06:45:49.434Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Sonnet 5's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465
Request ID: req_011CcnFFi6C7cW65SFu9WLSb
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: crypto-secrets
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75129, #75130, #75132, #75133, #75134, #75135, #75136, #75138, #75144, #75150, #75151, #75152, #75153, #75154, #75156, #75168, #75169, #75170, #75171, #75172
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.104 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗