[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive in com — req_011CccPazxsKTy6vJwwzLESY

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jul 2, 2026 by sworrl

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The safeguard flagged a request to perform a security/code audit of the user's own website using the project's source code, which was open as the current working directory in Claude Code. Reviewing one's own codebase for vulnerabilities is a standard, defensive development task with no offensive tooling, third-party targets, or exploitation involved. The block triggered on the general topic of "auditing a website" without accounting for the clear first-party ownership context, halting routine in-scope work.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-02T01:49:02.501Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CccPazxsKTy6vJwwzLESY (2026-07-02T01:49:02.501Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Sonnet 5's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465

Request ID: req_011CccPazxsKTy6vJwwzLESY

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.99 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗