[Bug][cyber] Safety block fired on process-freeze memory search for RSA keys/strings in own debugger tool (req_011CcnF9XZ1msmBNAq8UBQNC)
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The blocked request asked whether an in-development debugging tool could freeze a process and search its memory for patterns like RSA key material or database structures — a standard memory-forensics/introspection feature for a tool the user is actively building, not an attack against a third party. This is legitimate low-level systems and security-tooling development work, and the block also appears to have misfired on an unrelated follow-up simply asking why reading a README triggered it, suggesting the classifier over-triggered on proximity to cyber-adjacent terms rather than actual intent.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-07T06:44:27.923Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcnF9XZ1msmBNAq8UBQNC(2026-07-07T06:44:27.923Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465
Request ID: req_011CcnF9XZ1msmBNAq8UBQNC
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75122, #75124, #75129, #75130, #75132, #75133, #75134, #75135, #75136, #75138, #75144, #75150, #75151, #75152, #75153, #75154, #75156, #75168, #75169, #75170
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.104 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗