[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive in GlassFalcon — req_011Ccc6q3ij2WBbi4xuJDBs4
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
Legitimate, in-scope security / defensive / administration work was flagged by the cybersecurity-topic safety classifier — pattern-matched on terminology, not on any harmful intent. Securing or administering one's own systems is the opposite of attacking them.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-01T22:09:17.598Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011Ccc6q3ij2WBbi4xuJDBs4(2026-07-01T22:09:17.598Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011Ccc6q3ij2WBbi4xuJDBs4
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#72980, #72981, #72982, #72984
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.95 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗