[Bug][cyber] False-positive safeguard block stops legitimate cybersecurity assistance mid-session (req_011CcY1kC1p5G4SvH8vm5s6P)
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The blocked message was part of a legitimate defensive-security or security-audit workflow — a class of work explicitly listed as supported in Claude Code's documentation — not a request for offensive or harmful content. The safety filter appears to have triggered on cybersecurity terminology present in the context without evaluating whether the intent and output were defensive, educational, or within an authorized engagement. This pattern produces false positives for security practitioners doing exactly the kind of work Claude Code is documented to assist with, degrading reliability for a clearly in-scope use case.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-29T18:20:14.708Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcY1kC1p5G4SvH8vm5s6P(2026-06-29T18:20:14.708Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcY1kC1p5G4SvH8vm5s6P
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.95 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗