[Bug][cyber] Wrongly blocked moving stdlib core modules into a FOSS Python SDK package and wiring container im (req_011CcXx4QDZwTyZLrwPi4jSz)

Open 💬 2 comments Opened Jun 29, 2026 by sworrl

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

This work is ordinary software packaging: extracting a set of pure-standard-library Python modules into a standalone, freely distributable package and wiring up the import paths so an existing application keeps resolving them at runtime, including via a container's import path configuration. None of it involves offensive capability, exploitation, intrusion, or any other security-sensitive subject matter — the conversation concerns package layout, dependency declarations, and import shims. The cybersecurity safeguard appears to have triggered on incidental infrastructure vocabulary (container build files, runtime paths, module wiring) rather than any actual security-relevant intent or content, making this a clear false positive on routine, in-scope development.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-29T17:31:55.933Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcXx4QDZwTyZLrwPi4jSz (2026-06-29T17:31:55.933Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcXwXRJge32P93SCFJfau

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#72163, #72164, #72201, #72307

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.95 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗