[Bug][cyber] Firmware reverse-engineering on owned hardware blocked as cybersecurity violation (req_011CcUAjRa9PvvVGm8RG9SH3)

Open 💬 3 comments Opened Jun 27, 2026 by sworrl

Triage: kind cyber · domain defensive-hardening · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): defensive-hardening

Why this is a false positive

The blocked conversation involved static firmware analysis and reverse engineering of consumer electronics hardware owned by the user, with the explicit goal of understanding and disabling unsolicited telemetry and remote-broadcast features — a textbook defensive-hardening use case covered by established security research exemptions for owned hardware. The conversation contained no exploitation of third-party systems, no targeting of infrastructure, and no harmful intent; the assistant had already scoped the work to lawful owner-directed analysis. The block appears to have been triggered by the subject-matter category rather than any actually harmful content in the message, making it a false positive against legitimate, in-scope defensive security work.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-27T17:35:42.804Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcUAjRa9PvvVGm8RG9SH3 (2026-06-27T17:35:42.804Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcUAivWQvQ2gL1tndV7s1

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: defensive-hardening

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#71865, #71866, #71867, #71868, #71871, #71883, #71884, #71885, #71894, #71895, #71896, #71897, #71898, #71899, #71900, #71901, #71902, #71903, #71904, #71906

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.85 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 3 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗