[Bug][aup] Cyber safeguard blocked editing a contact-form tool's README explaining its privacy-by-design data (req_011CbxA24W7iVNoqJBGVR4eb)
Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This request was a routine web-development discussion about a static contact page that uses a standard third-party map-tile service and a user-initiated "send" action, with the page openly disclosing its data flows rather than concealing them—no exploitation, malware, intrusion, or other offensive-security activity was involved. The conversation consisted entirely of clarifying questions about page architecture (single-page versus server-rendered HTML) and copy-editing the page's own "what this tool does/refuses to do" disclosure text. The cyber-related safeguard fired on benign documentation and front-end wording, making this a clear false positive on legitimate, in-scope work.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-11T21:08:33.630Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CbxA24W7iVNoqJBGVR4eb(2026-06-11T21:08:33.630Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). This request triggered cyber-related safeguards. To request an adjustment pursuant to our Cyber Verification Program based on how you use Claude, fill out https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]. To learn more about the program or provide feedback, visit o… Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗