[Bug][cyber] Cyber safety filter false-positives on a benign non-security chat message, blocking normal conver (req_011CcCJz9U4N9ssZor5WVi3G)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The flagged message contained no cybersecurity content of any kind—it was a brief, conversational remark unrelated to security tooling, exploitation, or any sensitive technical domain. The classifier appears to have triggered on incidental phrasing rather than actual intent, blocking an ordinary, in-scope interaction. This is a clear false positive, and the safety gate prevented legitimate work from continuing.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-19T08:34:41.225Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcCJz9U4N9ssZor5WVi3G(2026-06-19T08:34:41.225Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcCJz9U4N9ssZor5WVi3G
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗