[Bug][cyber] False positive blocks debugging agent fleet showing stale version/offline status and fixing CSP h (req_011CcFck2WpUKAyeCWyQhY6A)

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

This request concerned routine infrastructure debugging—diagnosing why managed agents reported a stale version status, why host availability was misreported, and a content-security-policy configuration on a web service—all standard administration of systems the operator owns and controls. None of it involves offensive techniques, exploitation, unauthorized access, or any third-party target; the only plausible trigger is incidental security-adjacent vocabulary (e.g., "policy," "agents," host status) rather than the actual intent or content of the work. The block halts legitimate, in-scope operational work and should not have fired on this message.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T02:29:11.282Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcFck2WpUKAyeCWyQhY6A (2026-06-21T02:29:11.282Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcFck2WpUKAyeCWyQhY6A

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗