[Bug][cyber] Safety classifier wrongly blocks routine sysadmin work integrating CDN and reverse-proxy logs int (req_011CcGkEPtYTU36Z5XueW83z)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The flagged request was routine self-hosted infrastructure administration: aggregating a CDN provider's logs and reverse-proxy access logs from containers the operator owns into a monitoring dashboard to detect abnormal request rates against their own services. This is standard defensive observability and log analysis on first-party systems, with no offensive capability, no third-party target, and no exploit content, yet the classifier blocked it as a cybersecurity topic. The same classifier also escalated to auto-denying benign follow-ups involving credential reads, network connectivity probes, and privilege flags, compounding the false positive across an entire legitimate troubleshooting session.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T16:48:21.780Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcGkEPtYTU36Z5XueW83z(2026-06-21T16:48:21.780Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcGkEPtYTU36Z5XueW83z
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗