[Bug][cyber] Cloud IAM cleanup: reconciling a mail group's membership against active directory accounts blocke (req_011CcHQtusaaSJtyHBXFAWCZ)

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam

Why this is a false positive

The flagged work is routine cloud identity and access administration on the operator's own tenant: reconciling a distribution group's membership against currently active accounts and identifying users whose mailbox has been deprovisioned. Querying directory and mailbox state to add or remove members from a group the administrator owns is standard, authorized IT operations, not offensive security activity. The classifier appears to have matched on generic identity- and account-related terminology rather than any actual attempt to gain unauthorized access, evade controls, or target a third party.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-22T01:16:07.616Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcHQtusaaSJtyHBXFAWCZ (2026-06-22T01:16:07.616Z)
  • req_011CcHRBYyCbFHDQ3B6voV4d (2026-06-22T01:20:34.993Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcHQtusaaSJtyHBXFAWCZ

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗