[Bug][cyber] False positive during cloud IAM multi-factor authentication policy setup (req_011Cet7yr5rhGd8mP3otsGDT)
Triage: kind cyber · domain cloud-iam · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam
Why this is a false positive
The safeguard triggered during routine configuration of cloud identity access management policies and multi-factor authentication settings. The flagging message contained a brief frustrated exclamation directed at the assistant mid-session following a previous interruption, with no person addressed or sensitive content provided. Terminating the active session over user venting interrupts legitimate identity management tasks without identifying any security risk.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-09-09T15:43:06.107Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011Cet7yr5rhGd8mP3otsGDT(2026-09-09T15:43:06.107Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude
Details: [cyber]
Request ID: req_011Cet7yr5rhGd8mP3otsGDT
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#94118, #94119, #94120
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗