[Bug][cyber] Claude Code safety false-positive on legitimate work (req_011CcPKjB1Zm8zZe541NDjZW)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam
Why this is a false positive
The blocked request was a routine cloud IAM enumeration task — programmatically listing an organization's tenant metadata and user directory through standard administrative API calls — performed as authorized in-scope work. These are read-only directory queries using documented, first-party management APIs, the same operations a tenant administrator runs daily; they carry no exploit, malware, or offensive payload. The cybersecurity classifier appears to be keying on benign IAM/identity terminology rather than any actual harmful capability, blocking ordinary administration and incident-response work.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-25T04:10:50.583Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcPKjB1Zm8zZe541NDjZW(2026-06-25T04:10:50.583Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcPKjB1Zm8zZe541NDjZW
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v1.6.2 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗