[DOCS] Commands docs still describe removed `/simplify` behavior instead of `/code-review`

Status Fixed / completed
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 3 comments · opened May 21, 2026 · closed May 23, 2026

Documentation Type

Incorrect/outdated documentation

Documentation Location

https://code.claude.com/docs/en/commands

Section/Topic

Commands across a typical workflow and the /simplify [focus] command entry

Current Documentation

The docs currently say:

Before you ship. /diff shows what changed, /simplify reviews recent files and applies quality and efficiency fixes, and /review or /security-review give a deeper read-only pass. /simplify [focus] | Skill. Review your recently changed files for code reuse, quality, and efficiency issues, then fix them. Spawns three review agents in parallel, aggregates their findings, and applies fixes. Pass text to focus on specific concerns: /simplify focus on memory efficiency

Related docs also still say:

Prompt-based playbooks included with Claude Code, such as /batch, /simplify, /debug, and /loop. Claude Code includes a set of bundled skills that are available in every session, including /simplify, /batch, /debug, /loop, and /claude-api.

What's Wrong or Missing?

Changelog v2.1.147 says:

Renamed /simplify to /code-review. It now reports correctness bugs at a chosen effort level (e.g., /code-review high); pass --comment to post findings as inline GitHub PR comments. The old cleanup-and-fix behavior has been removed

A. The commands reference still documents the removed /simplify name

The primary command docs still tell users to run /simplify, so the current slash command rename is not reflected in the place users look up command syntax.

B. The documented behavior is the pre-v2.1.147 workflow

The current text says the command fixes reuse/quality/efficiency issues and applies changes automatically. That contradicts v2.1.147, where the command now reports correctness bugs and no longer does cleanup-and-fix work.

C. The new invocation details are missing

The docs do not document the current /code-review <effort> form or the --comment option for posting findings as inline GitHub PR comments.

Suggested Improvement

Update the commands reference and bundled-skill references to match v2.1.147.

Before:

/simplify [focus] ... review your recently changed files for code reuse, quality, and efficiency issues, then fix them.

After:

/code-review [effort] [--comment] | Skill. Review recent changes for correctness bugs at a chosen effort level, for example /code-review high. Add --comment to post findings as inline GitHub PR comments. This command reports findings only; the old cleanup-and-fix workflow has been removed.

Also update the narrative and bundled-skill lists on related pages so they stop advertising /simplify as the current command name.

Impact

Medium - Makes feature difficult to understand

Additional Context

Affected Pages:

| Page | Line(s) | Context |
|------|---------|---------|
| https://code.claude.com/docs/en/commands | 25, 112 | Still tells users to run /simplify and says it applies fixes |
| https://code.claude.com/docs/en/skills | 14, 23 | Bundled skills list still names /simplify |
| https://code.claude.com/docs/en/glossary | 59 | Bundled skills glossary example still names /simplify |
| https://code.claude.com/docs/en/features-overview | 246 | Skills overview still lists /simplify as a bundled skill |

Total scope: 4 pages affected

There is already a separate https://code.claude.com/docs/en/code-review page for the GitHub Code Review product, so the command reference should explicitly document the slash command rename and behavior to avoid conflating the two.

View original on GitHub ↗

3 Comments

github-actions[bot] · 4 months ago

Found 1 possible duplicate issue:

  1. https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/61030

This issue will be automatically closed as a duplicate in 3 days.

  • If your issue is a duplicate, please close it and 👍 the existing issue instead
  • To prevent auto-closure, add a comment or 👎 this comment

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

coygeek · 4 months ago

Issue #61322 Verification

Title: [DOCS] Commands docs still describe removed /simplify behavior instead of /code-review
Issue Date: Unknown
Verification Date: 2026-05-22
Status: RESOLVED

---

Issue Summary

This issue reports that the commands reference and related bundled-skill pages still documented /simplify as the current command, described the pre-v2.1.147 cleanup-and-fix behavior, and omitted the newer /code-review [effort] [--comment] invocation details.

---

Verification Results

Claim 1: The commands reference still documents /simplify as the current command name

Status: RESOLVED

At https://code.claude.com/docs/en/commands, line 25: "Before you ship. /diff shows what changed, /code-review checks the diff for correctness bugs, and /review or /security-review give a deeper read-only pass."

At https://code.claude.com/docs/en/commands, line 53: "/code-review [low\|medium\|high\|xhigh\|max] [--comment] [target] ... Formerly /simplify, which still works as an alias"

Verdict: The commands page now presents /code-review as the primary command name and relegates /simplify to an alias, so the reported naming problem is no longer present.

---

Claim 2: The docs still describe the removed cleanup-and-fix behavior instead of the current review-only behavior

Status: RESOLVED

At https://code.claude.com/docs/en/commands, line 53: "Review the current diff for correctness bugs and report findings without editing files."

At https://code.claude.com/docs/en/commands, line 53: "Lower effort levels return fewer, higher-confidence findings, while high through max give broader coverage and may include uncertain findings."

Verdict: The current command description matches the review-only behavior described in the issue and no longer says the command applies cleanup or efficiency fixes automatically.

---

Claim 3: The new /code-review invocation details and related bundled-skill references are still missing

Status: RESOLVED

At https://code.claude.com/docs/en/commands, line 53: "/code-review [low\|medium\|high\|xhigh\|max] [--comment] [target]"

At https://code.claude.com/docs/en/skills, line 14: "For built-in commands like /help and /compact, and bundled skills like /debug and /code-review, see the commands reference"

At https://code.claude.com/docs/en/skills, line 23: "Claude Code includes a set of bundled skills that are available in every session, including /code-review, /batch, /debug, /loop, and /claude-api."

At https://code.claude.com/docs/en/glossary, line 59: "Prompt-based playbooks included with Claude Code, such as /batch, /code-review, /debug, and /loop."

At https://code.claude.com/docs/en/features-overview, line 246: "Claude Code includes bundled skills like /code-review, /batch, and /debug that work out of the box."

Verdict: The commands page now documents the effort-level and --comment invocation details, and the related bundled-skill pages referenced in the issue have been updated to use /code-review.

---

Current State

| Claim | Status |
|-------|--------|
| Commands reference still uses /simplify as the current command | RESOLVED |
| Commands reference still describes the old cleanup-and-fix behavior | RESOLVED |
| /code-review invocation details and related bundled-skill references are missing | RESOLVED |

---

Suggested Fix

N/A - issue has been resolved.

---

References

  • URL: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/commands
  • Lines 25-25: Workflow summary uses /code-review instead of /simplify.
  • Lines 53-53: Command table documents /code-review [low|medium|high|xhigh|max] [--comment] [target], describes review-only behavior, and notes /simplify only as an alias.

---

Conclusion & Recommendation

Primary Concern: The issue reported that current command docs and related bundled-skill pages still exposed the obsolete /simplify name and behavior instead of the newer /code-review workflow.

Resolution Status: RESOLVED

Recommendation: CLOSE

The current commands reference now documents /code-review as the primary command, includes the effort-level and --comment syntax, and describes review-only behavior. The related bundled-skill pages cited in the issue also now use /code-review, so the reported documentation gap has been fixed.

---

github-actions[bot] · 3 months ago

This issue has been automatically locked since it was closed and has not had any activity for 7 days. If you're experiencing a similar issue, please file a new issue and reference this one if it's relevant.