[BUG] /ultrareview Find step fails with empty [] for local repos — 3 attempts, all failed, and consumed all 3 free credits

Resolved 💬 3 comments Opened Apr 25, 2026 by ivibes Closed May 29, 2026

Preflight Checklist

  • [x] I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet
  • [x] This is a single bug report (please file separate reports for different bugs)
  • [x] I am using the latest version of Claude Code

What's Wrong?

Hi, I ran /ultrareview master three times and it failed every time at the "Find" step, returning an empty result. The Verify and Dedupe steps never ran.

I tried:

After the reported outage was resolved
After creating a new cloud environment
Different times across two days
Nothing changed the outcome.

My repo is local-only (no GitHub remote), 835 files. Not sure if that's related.

Since all 3 failures were caused by what appears to be a bug on your end, I'd appreciate having my free credits restored.

Thanks

<img width="817" height="388" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9dde4dbf-b452-410f-be41-52ece5629ae9" />

What Should Happen?

Ultrareview works and returns result.

Error Messages/Logs

[heartbeat] 14:30:27


<remote-review>[]</remote-review>

Steps to Reproduce

Open a project in Claude Code Desktop (local git repo, no GitHub remote)
Run /ultrareview master
Cloud session starts, clones repo, Setup completes
Find step fails — only shows heartbeat timestamps, returns <remote-review>[]</remote-review>
Verify and Dedupe steps never run
Repo size: 835 files, 523,828 lines added

Claude Model

Not sure / Multiple models

Is this a regression?

I don't know

Last Working Version

_No response_

Claude Code Version

Claude Code 2.1.114

Platform

Anthropic API

Operating System

macOS

Terminal/Shell

Terminal.app (macOS)

Additional Information

Claude Desktop: Claude 1.4758.0 (fb266c) 2026-04-24T20:22:30.000Z

<img width="649" height="730" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/63c13faa-0bda-4efe-a88b-f06e4c3e397b" />

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 3 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗