[BUG] claude-code 2.1.110 no longer sending DEC 2026 messages on terminals that support it

Resolved 💬 8 comments Opened Apr 16, 2026 by lucasec Closed Apr 19, 2026

Preflight Checklist

  • [x] I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet
  • [x] This is a single bug report (please file separate reports for different bugs)
  • [x] I am using the latest version of Claude Code

What's Wrong?

Claude Code has supported the DEC 2026 synchronized output terminal extension for some time, which can help to reduce screen tearing and other artifacts when Claude redraws the scrollback buffer.

Since Claude 2.1.110, I've noticed Claude is no longer sending DEC 2026 enable/disable commands on my terminal which supports it. I use a modified version of the Emacs eat terminal emulator, which uses a TERM value of eat-truecolor. Its terminfo advertises the Sync capability, and it responds to DECRPM queries to test for the availability of the feature. I also tested setting my TERM value to xterm-256color to match iTerm, and Claude also does not send the sync messages.

Meanwhile, if I set my TERM to xterm-ghostty or xterm-kitty, Claude continues to send DEC 2026 instructions.

What Should Happen?

I assume Claude is now relying on a hardcoded list of terminal which support this feature, but this penalizes us users who run more obscure terminal emulators. Claude should support checking for DEC 2026 support using the DECRPM instruction, or a hardcoded list plus looking for the Sync feature in the terminfo (ghostty includes this feature in its custom terminfo, but other emulators such as iTerm that rely on a standard terminfo such as xterm-256color do not).

Error Messages/Logs

Steps to Reproduce

Launch claude in an affected terminal. When Claude produces a large amount of output, screen tearing will occur.

Claude Model

None

Is this a regression?

Yes, this worked in a previous version

Last Working Version

2.1.109

Claude Code Version

2.1.112

Platform

AWS Bedrock

Operating System

macOS

Terminal/Shell

iTerm2

Additional Information

_No response_

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 8 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗