[BUG] Session usage meter accruing at impossible rate — Max plan, single + multi-session usage
Preflight Checklist
- [x] I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet
- [x] This is a single bug report (please file separate reports for different bugs)
- [x] I am using the latest version of Claude Code
What's Wrong?
[BUG] Session usage meter accruing at impossible rate — Max plan, single + multi-session usage
Preflight Checklist
I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet
Claude Code version 2.1.41 (freshly updated from 2.0.72)
OS Windows 11
Terminal PowerShell
Plan Claude Max
PowerShell
Bug Description
Session usage is accruing at a rate that is completely disproportionate to actual work being performed. On a
Max plan, a single session went from 0% to 84% in under 50 minutes with minimal activity (settings
navigation, light conversation — no coding, no file operations, no tool use).
Expected Behaviour
A Max plan session should sustain several hours of active work across multiple sessions
Usage accrual should correlate with actual token consumption
If limits are being reached, clear notification should be provided rather than silent session exits
Related Issues
#18987 — Session limit consumption far exceeds actual token usage
#24719 — Rate limit triggers before reaching 100% usage
#19673 — "You've hit your limit" while usage shows 84%
#8926 — Reset time inconsistent between CLI and claude.ai
#24478 — CLI freezes and becomes unresponsive (SIGKILL required)
#19060 — CLI freezes with "No messages returned" error
Impact
At the current accrual rate, the Max plan — which is priced and marketed for power users running multi-session
workflows — cannot sustain even a single hour of light usage. This represents a significant gap between what is
being paid for and what is being delivered.
What Should Happen?
Context
This was observed immediately after updating from 2.0.72 to 2.1.41
I typically run 3–4 concurrent sessions in my normal workflow
Even accounting for multiple sessions, the accrual rate is excessive
Several of my sessions run a lightweight validation workflow: send instruction to Google Vertex →
Vertex processes and returns output → Claude reads the output file → Claude makes targeted edits →
revalidates. The heavy token work is done by Vertex, not Claude Code
The coding sessions involve standard file editing — nothing unusually large
This pattern has been occurring over the past several days, not just post-update
Error Messages/Logs
Session Exit Examples
Example 1 — Session exits mid-documentation update:
Example 2 — Session exits during bash command execution:
● Same result. Let me check this output to see what the LLM returned.
● Read(outputs\VERTEX_document_validation_..._2026-02-13_1610.md)
⎿ Read 175 lines
· Updating documentation… (esc to interrupt · ctrl+t to show todos · 3m 58s · ↓ 5.2k tokens · thinking)
>
⏵⏵ accept edits on (shift+tab to cycle)
PS C:\Users\simpl\dev_files\...>
In both cases, Claude Code drops to the PowerShell prompt without any error output or session limit
notification.
Steps to Reproduce
Timeline (Single Session, Minimal Activity)
Time Elapsed Session Usage Activity
~0 min 0% Fresh session start
~15 min 19% Navigated settings, ran claude update
~38 min 69% Continued light conversation only
~48 min 84% No change in activity
Session resets in ~4 hr 12 min at time of last check. At this burn rate, the full 5-hour session window would be
exhausted in approximately 55–60 minutes.
Claude Model
Opus
Is this a regression?
I don't know
Last Working Version
_No response_
Claude Code Version
2.1.41
Platform
Other
Operating System
Windows
Terminal/Shell
PowerShell
Additional Information
Additional Observations
Usage meter has been observed jumping 10–20% in the space of a few minutes, then taking much longer
to progress through an equivalent amount
The accrual rate does not correlate with the complexity or volume of work being performed
Sessions have also been exiting/dropping unexpectedly mid-task without error messages (separate but
potentially related issue — see terminal output below)
This issue has 11 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗