[MODEL] Failed to Recognize Required Signature Change

Resolved 💬 4 comments Opened Dec 30, 2025 by squarestar Closed Feb 14, 2026

Preflight Checklist

  • [x] I have searched existing issues for similar behavior reports
  • [x] This report does NOT contain sensitive information (API keys, passwords, etc.)

Type of Behavior Issue

Other unexpected behavior

What You Asked Claude to Do

I asked claude to review and fix an issue with where type hints in PHP were not accounting for variable arguments (hint was for array but array|string was acceptable).

Specifically, method pluckSecondaryEntryValuesForManagementPage() had callers passing different data types than the signature accepted.

I enabled thinking mode and instructed that no resources should be spared in the analysis.

What Claude Actually Did

Claude only modified only the calling methods, not the signature, leaving the fatal error intact.

Expected Behavior

Claude should have realised that fixing the called method's signature was critical to the fix.

Files Affected

Permission Mode

I don't know / Not sure

Can You Reproduce This?

No, only happened once

Steps to Reproduce

Probably not reproducible.

Claude Model

Other

Relevant Conversation

I don't have this any more.

Impact

High - Significant unwanted changes

Claude Code Version

2.0.74

Platform

Anthropic API

Additional Context

Summary

When debugging a TypeError related to method parameters, Claude suggested fixing only the calling code instead of recognizing the method signature needed to be changed.

Details

  • Issue: Method pluckSecondaryEntryValuesForManagementPage() in _lib/ProjectManager.php had callers passing different data types than the signature accepted
  • Claude's response: Modified only the calling methods, not the signature
  • Correct approach: The signature itself needed to be updated to accept the actual types being passed
  • Impact: Time wasted on an incomplete fix; real issue remained unresolved until signature was changed. Additionally significant time spent trying to address the cause of the error, determine if it was due to project context, errors on my part, etc

Why This Matters

This is a fundamental pattern in typed languages — when there's a type mismatch at the call site, the signature must be verified and potentially updated. Missing this suggests a gap in type system reasoning.

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 4 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗