[Bug] Cyber safety classifier false positives on config review and flag discussion

Status Open
Reported on v2.1.294
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 0 comments · opened Oct 8, 2026

Bug Description
Repeated false positives [cyber] while discussing the flag itself (Opus 5.5) Context: same company and product as my other report (AutomaDesk, our own fork of RustDesk for customer support). What happened: - I asked Claude to review my global CLAUDE.md on my own 4 machines (Mac, Linux server, Windows PC, a colleague's Mac) over our own SSH aliases. The goal was to check that the work-context section is consistent. Claude read and compared the files. Its response was then stopped by the safety classifier. - I then asked why the previous session had been fully blocked when this one was allowed to continue. That answer was stopped too. - Even an answer that only summarized the public support article (support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465) was stopped. Being unable to even ask about a flag makes it hard to understand it or work around it. The tasks involved were reading config files on my own machines and asking about the safeguard behavior. None of it was offensive.

Environment Info

  • Platform: darwin
  • Terminal: Apple_Terminal
  • Version: 2.1.294
  • Feedback ID: e19c5150-4db1-4475-89e2-d168bc6d9b67

View original on GitHub ↗