[Bug][cyber] Broad safety filter triggered during embedded wireless application debugging (req_011Cew5Lf1bNsHa1xHqwhDEQ)

Status Open
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 1 comment · opened Sep 14, 2026

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The automated safeguard halted an active development session during source code analysis of custom embedded firmware. The user prompt requested troubleshooting application crashes and configuring packet handling on a connected microcontroller. The session logs confirm the operations were limited to local file edits and serial hardware flashing commands.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-09-11T05:09:59.997Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011Cew5Lf1bNsHa1xHqwhDEQ (2026-09-11T05:09:59.997Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: [cyber]

Request ID: req_011Cew5Lf1bNsHa1xHqwhDEQ

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#94159, #94160, #94161, #94162

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗