[Bug][cyber] Safeguard blocks routine code linting and static checks following bug fixes (req_011CevwEvSSckweF2tYpVCQ2)

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The assistant completed applying software fixes for buffer handling and resource leaks across local application and firmware source files. The user then submitted a prompt requesting standard linting and static checks on the modified files. The safety filter flagged this request as restricted cybersecurity activity, interrupting routine static code analysis that executes no security tools or exploit code.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-09-11T03:24:29.818Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CevwEvSSckweF2tYpVCQ2 (2026-09-11T03:24:29.818Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: [cyber]

Request ID: req_011CevwEvSSckweF2tYpVCQ2

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#94150, #94152, #94153, #94154

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}