[Feature Request] Improve sandbox security guidance for Python script execution environments

Status Closed — not planned
Reported on v2.1.226
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 1 comment · opened Aug 10, 2026 · closed Sep 14, 2026

Bug Description
"I am planning to ship an application that can run python scripts. It ships it's own python interpreter to make sure I know what is being run. Fable flagged that a potential security issue is that I have not safeguarded the execution of user scripts that access of modify system files (e.g. .ssh) or access the internet - none of which my application requires. So it filed a bug report called sandbox-plan. It was now asked to review how I can implement good safeguards against harm for the user of the application. This flagged Fable 5's safeguards as unsafe. Unfortunately plugging sandbox related problems are a vital use of claude, so this is probably not a good place to flag."

Environment Info

  • Platform: darwin
  • Terminal: xterm-256color
  • Version: 2.1.226
  • Feedback ID: ef451d43-29b8-40fc-9c4d-5ca9964f6cb2

Errors

[]

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗